Repository logo
 

Further exploring negative anger consequences

dc.contributor.authorKellaway, Julie A., author
dc.contributor.authorDeffenbacher, Jerry L., advisor
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T19:53:54Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T19:53:54Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.description.abstractThe nature and prediction of negative anger consequences have received limited attention from researchers. This research explored the cognitive, affective, and behavioral/expressive components of anger as predictors of anger consequences. Eight hundred and three introductory psychology students completed the Trait Anger Scale (affective), Hostile Automatic Thoughts Inventory (cognitive), Anger Expression Inventory (behavioral/expressive), Anger Consequences Scale (frequency of anger consequences), and Anger Consequences Severity Scale (severity of anger consequences in a specific situation). The Anger Consequences Scale was updated with 88 additional consequences and exploratory factor analysis revealed 12 factors: Somatic Outcomes, Physical Aggression/Injury to Others, Mixture of Severe Consequences, Hurt Self Physically, Verbal Fights, Reckless Driving, Negative School/Work Consequences, Substance Abuse, Injury to Children/Animals, Property Damage, Negative Emotions, and Vocational Consequences. Seven of 12 scales replicated earlier factors, and five were new. The frequency and severity of anger consequences did not correlate highly. Cognitive, emotional, and behavioral/expressive measures generally correlated logically with anger consequences. Hierarchical regression models explored the simultaneous contributions of sex, affective, cognitive, and expressive variables and sex x variable interactions. Variance accounted for ranged from 5.2% to 53.5% for frequency of anger consequences and from 3.8% to 15.9% for severity of anger consequences. The greatest variance predicted was for the frequency of anger leading to property damage (53.5%), physically aggression and injury to others (49.1%), and verbal fights (47.5%). Sex x anger variable interactions entered only one model. Sex, trait anger, and hostile automatic thoughts entered some models. Forms of anger expression (especially physically aggressive expression toward others or objects and verbally aggressive expressive expression) more consistency entered the regression models. In general, results indicated that: (1) the frequency of anger consequences may be better explained than the severity of anger consequences in a specific event; (2) different sets of predictors tended to predict different types of consequences (i.e., there was no common or consistent set of predictors); (3) sex, cognitive, and affective variables entered fewer models than behavioral/expressive variables; and (4) there was minimal evidence that sex moderated how variables predicted negative anger consequences. Diagnostic considerations, along with the limitations of the study, were discussed.
dc.format.mediumborn digital
dc.format.mediumdoctoral dissertations
dc.identifierETDF_Kellaway_2009_3400996.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10217/237811
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof2000-2019
dc.rightsCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.
dc.rights.licensePer the terms of a contractual agreement, all use of this item is limited to the non-commercial use of Colorado State University and its authorized users.
dc.subjectanger
dc.subjectnegative consequences
dc.subjectclinical psychology
dc.titleFurther exploring negative anger consequences
dc.typeText
dcterms.rights.dplaThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/). You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychology
thesis.degree.grantorColorado State University
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ETDF_Kellaway_2009_3400996.pdf
Size:
1.94 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format