Repository logo
 

Non-target effects and soil persistence of indaziflam: implications for seed-based restoration of cheatgrass-invaded landscapes in the Colorado Front Range

dc.contributor.authorMyers, Lauren, author
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Cynthia S., advisor
dc.contributor.authorHavrilla, Caroline, advisor
dc.contributor.authorDayan, Franck E., committee member
dc.contributor.authorPaschke, Mark, committee member
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-01T10:42:07Z
dc.date.available2025-09-01T10:42:07Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractInvasive species threaten ecosystems around the world. In the grasslands and shrublands of western North America, invasive annual grasses, especially Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass or downy brome), pose ecological and economic threats through their inhibitory interactions with native species, exacerbation of wildfires through increased fine fuel loads, and poor forage and habitat quality. As a winter annual species, cheatgrass also possesses a phenological advantage that makes it especially difficult to eradicate. Indaziflam, a pre-emergent biocellulose inhibiting herbicide with residual soil activity, has established a new paradigm of control for cheatgrass and other invasive annual grasses. Indaziflam is highly effective in reducing the cover of cheatgrass for at least two to three years without harming established perennial grasses. However, the effects of indaziflam on non-target species are less clear. Given that indaziflam is used pre-emergence, it may inhibit the germination of non-target species as well, which is a concern for land managers, especially when practicing seed-based restoration. We conducted a greenhouse study to assess the dose-response relationship between indaziflam and native species commonly used for seed-based restoration in the Colorado Front Range, Colorado, USA. We also conducted a field study to assess the quantities of indaziflam residue in various soils in sites treated with indaziflam in the Colorado Front Range at varying points in the past. First, I will review the literature on indaziflam as it pertains to its mechanism of action, target impacts, and non-target impacts. Next, I will provide an overview of the greenhouse and field studies. Using the filter framework of community assembly, I argue that while B. tectorum acts as a biotic filter to native species establishment and its control is vital for restoration of invaded landscapes, indaziflam may also act as an unintentional abiotic filter to native species establishment.
dc.format.mediumborn digital
dc.format.mediummasters theses
dc.identifierMyers_colostate_0053N_19110.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10217/241778
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.25675/3.02098
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof2020-
dc.rightsCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.
dc.subjectecological restoration
dc.subjectindaziflam
dc.subjectrangeland
dc.subjectecology
dc.subjectcheatgrass
dc.subjectinvasive species
dc.titleNon-target effects and soil persistence of indaziflam: implications for seed-based restoration of cheatgrass-invaded landscapes in the Colorado Front Range
dc.typeText
dcterms.rights.dplaThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/). You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
thesis.degree.disciplineEcology
thesis.degree.grantorColorado State University
thesis.degree.levelMasters
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science (M.S.)

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Myers_colostate_0053N_19110.pdf
Size:
1.64 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format