Creating boundary objects supports knowledge co-development processes: a case study evaluation from the Colorado Front Range
dc.contributor.author | Brown, Hannah L. C., author | |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng, Antony S., author | |
dc.contributor.author | Clark, Nehalem C., author | |
dc.contributor.author | Slack, Andrew W., author | |
dc.contributor.author | Wolk, Brett H., author | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-07T18:27:47Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-08-07T18:27:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-04-27 | |
dc.description.abstract | This qualitative case study evaluates manager and researcher perceptions of the impact of a place-based, collaborative knowledge co-development process and examines the outcomes of that co-development for changes to management approaches. The USDA Forest Service (Forest Service) Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report 373 (GTR-373) is a codeveloped science synthesis that functions as a boundary object providing a framework for planning, designing, and implementing management action for restoration of ponderosa and dry mixed-conifer forests. The process of creating and socializing the GTR-373 framework fostered continual knowledge exchange and engagement between researchers and managers across different organizations and levels of decision-making. This built trust in the information, improved justification for management action, developed a common foundation for cross-boundary implementation, and increased communication. The framework has been applied across jurisdictions and has been used as a foundational tool for training staff and designing projects. However, adapting the GTR-373 framework across scales remains challenging. Study Implications: This qualitative case study evaluates a co-development process in which researchers and managers from multi¬ple organizations and agencies collaborated to produce a science-informed restoration framework to support forest management on the Colorado Front Range (GTR-373). The process built trust, improved justification for management action, developed a common foundation for implementation, and increased communication. However, cross-boundary management across spatial scales remains challenging, and managers interpret information through organizational mandates and site-specific context. Sustained collaboration between researchers and land managers can help make science actionable and relevant at the appropriate scale for planning and management across expertise and jurisdictional boundaries. | |
dc.format.medium | born digital | |
dc.format.medium | articles | |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Hannah L C Brown, Antony S Cheng, Nehalem C Clark, Andrew W Slack, Brett H Wolk, Creating Boundary Objects Supports Knowledge Co-development Processes: A Case Study Evaluation from the Colorado Front Range, Journal of Forestry, Volume 122, Issue 4, July 2024, Pages 363 372, https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvae010 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvae010 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10217/241558 | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Colorado State University. Libraries | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Publications | |
dc.rights.license | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | collaborative adaptive management | |
dc.subject | collaboration | |
dc.subject | knowledge codevelopment | |
dc.subject | science application | |
dc.subject | boundary object | |
dc.subject | forest management | |
dc.title | Creating boundary objects supports knowledge co-development processes: a case study evaluation from the Colorado Front Range | |
dc.type | Text | |
dc.type | Image |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1