Repository logo
 

Creating boundary objects supports knowledge co-development processes: a case study evaluation from the Colorado Front Range

dc.contributor.authorBrown, Hannah L. C., author
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Antony S., author
dc.contributor.authorClark, Nehalem C., author
dc.contributor.authorSlack, Andrew W., author
dc.contributor.authorWolk, Brett H., author
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-07T18:27:47Z
dc.date.available2025-08-07T18:27:47Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-27
dc.description.abstractThis qualitative case study evaluates manager and researcher perceptions of the impact of a place-based, collaborative knowledge co-development process and examines the outcomes of that co-development for changes to management approaches. The USDA Forest Service (Forest Service) Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report 373 (GTR-373) is a codeveloped science synthesis that functions as a boundary object providing a framework for planning, designing, and implementing management action for restoration of ponderosa and dry mixed-conifer forests. The process of creating and socializing the GTR-373 framework fostered continual knowledge exchange and engagement between researchers and managers across different organizations and levels of decision-making. This built trust in the information, improved justification for management action, developed a common foundation for cross-boundary implementation, and increased communication. The framework has been applied across jurisdictions and has been used as a foundational tool for training staff and designing projects. However, adapting the GTR-373 framework across scales remains challenging. Study Implications: This qualitative case study evaluates a co-development process in which researchers and managers from multi¬ple organizations and agencies collaborated to produce a science-informed restoration framework to support forest management on the Colorado Front Range (GTR-373). The process built trust, improved justification for management action, developed a common foundation for implementation, and increased communication. However, cross-boundary management across spatial scales remains challenging, and managers interpret information through organizational mandates and site-specific context. Sustained collaboration between researchers and land managers can help make science actionable and relevant at the appropriate scale for planning and management across expertise and jurisdictional boundaries.
dc.format.mediumborn digital
dc.format.mediumarticles
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationHannah L C Brown, Antony S Cheng, Nehalem C Clark, Andrew W Slack, Brett H Wolk, Creating Boundary Objects Supports Knowledge Co-development Processes: A Case Study Evaluation from the Colorado Front Range, Journal of Forestry, Volume 122, Issue 4, July 2024, Pages 363 372, https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvae010
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvae010
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10217/241558
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.relation.ispartofPublications
dc.rights.licenseThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectcollaborative adaptive management
dc.subjectcollaboration
dc.subjectknowledge codevelopment
dc.subjectscience application
dc.subjectboundary object
dc.subjectforest management
dc.titleCreating boundary objects supports knowledge co-development processes: a case study evaluation from the Colorado Front Range
dc.typeText
dc.typeImage

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
CFRI_fvae010.pdf
Size:
447.74 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections