Repository logo
 

Publications

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/10217/241603

Browse

Recent Submissions

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Validation of a home food environment instrument assessing household food patterning and quality
    (Colorado State University. Libraries, 2021-11-03) Barrett, Katherine J., author; Hibbs-Shipp, Sarah K., author; Hobbs, Savannah, author; Boles, Richard E., author; Johnson, Susan L., author; Bellows, Laura L., author; MDPI, publisher
    The home food environment (HFE) is associated with dietary intake; yet measuring HFE quality often requires burdensome collection of detailed inventories. This project evaluated the capacity of the Home Inventory to Describe Eating and Activity, version 2 (Home-IDEA2) to capture HFE quality by measuring the presence or absence of household foods. Validity was tested using a modified application of the Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI). Comparative data were drawn from the National Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey (FoodAPS) Food-at-Home Public Use File. HEI scores were calculated for 4202 households in FoodAPS using Home-IDEA2 inventories and full reported inventories. Paired t-tests compared: (1) estimated vs. total edible grams (EEG; TEG); (2) limited vs. all reported foods; and (3) EEG + limited foods vs. TEG + all reported foods. Sensitivity and range of scores were compared. Mean HEI scores for Home-IDEA2 were higher (p < 0.003) than FoodAPS: (1) 51.6 ± 16.1 vs. 49.6 ± 18.1 (food amounts); (2) 53.5 ± 15.8 vs. 49.8 ± 15.4 (food items); (3) 55.5 ± 15.7 vs. 49.8 ± 15.4 (full instrument); differences were small. Scores demonstrated comparable sensitivity and range. The study found that the Home-IDEA2 can capture HFE quality adequately with low data collection burden.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Nutritional content and ingredients of commercial infant and toddler food pouches compared with other packages available in the United States
    (Colorado State University. Libraries, 2019) Moding, Kameron J., author; Ferrante, Mackenzie J., author; Bellows, Laura L., author; Bakke, Alyssa J., author; Hayes, John E., author; Johnson, Susan L., author; Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc., publisher
    The ingredients and nutrients of infant and toddler foods (ITFs) sold in pouches were compared with products available in other packages, such as jars/packs and other containers. Company websites (n = 21) and in-store shelf inventory (n = 3) were used to create a database of commercial ITFs containing vegetables (n = 548) sold in the United States. Results indicated that ITFs containing vegetables were most commonly packaged in pouches (50%), followed by "other" packages (25%) and jars/packs (25%). Infant and toddler food pouches contained significantly more sugars per serving and per Reference Amount Customarily Consumed, as well as a greater percentage of calories from sugars, compared with both jars/packs and "other" packages. Pouches were also more likely to contain vegetable/fruit blends, whereas jars/packs were more likely to contain single-vegetable or multivegetable blends, and "other" packages were more likely to contain vegetable/other ingredient combinations (eg, grains and/or dairy). Pouches are popular, widely available, and convenient but may not represent the vegetable profiles and nutritional qualities that parents believe they are buying for their children.